✅ Consolidated Checklist

Purpose: To ensure that the EU’s executive agencies translate policy into safe, effective, and learning-oriented implementation that strengthens independent media, research, and information-integrity ecosystems.

Apply this checklist when designing calls, assessing proposals, or managing projects under Creative Europe, Horizon Europe, and other agency-managed programmes.


🛡️ 1. Do No Harm

Area

Key Questions

Action Points

Safety & Security

Are digital, legal, and psycho-social safety costs eligible?

Make safety a standard cost category across all calls. Pre-approve expenses for digital security, legal defence, and staff well-being.

Visibility & Confidentiality

Could publication of beneficiary data or logos endanger grantees?

Introduce risk-review gates before publishing results. Apply visibility-waiver templates consistently.

Reporting & Data

Do reporting or audit requirements expose sensitive data?

Allow anonymised or redacted reporting. Collect only essential data and store securely.

Programme Design

Are funding conditions creating donor dependency or administrative overload?

Include proportionate requirements and simplify documentation for small or first-time grantees.


💶 2. Increase Funding

Dimension

Minimum Safeguard

Enhanced Practice

Predictability

Multi-year frameworks or staged disbursements to smooth cash flow.

Introduce rolling or bridge-funding windows to prevent project gaps.

Accessibility

Simplified procedures for small or local actors.

Create a “first-time grantee track” with mentoring and proportionate compliance checks.

Flexibility

Allow justified budget reallocations within cost categories.

Approve emergency reallocations for safety or legal defence without prior amendment.


🧩 3. Whole-of-System Perspective

Ecosystem Element

Key Questions

Action Points

Complementarity

Does the project align with EU and Member-State initiatives?

Add ecosystem impact as an evaluation criterion. Reward proposals that fill gaps rather than duplicate others.

Partnerships

Do calls encourage multi-actor consortia?

Require international-regional-local partnerships and fund coordination time as a deliverable.

Sustainability

Are projects focused on short-term outputs?

Score higher for projects that include viability plans and knowledge transfer mechanisms.


🌍 4. Local Leadership & Ownership

Aspect

Questions

Action Points

Participation

Are smaller or regional actors meaningfully included?

Adjust eligibility rules and scoring to favour inclusive consortia and local leads.

Capacity-building

Are partners supported to meet EU standards?

Budget for compliance mentoring and administrative training within projects.

Representation

Do selection panels reflect geographical and thematic diversity?

Involve experts from partner regions and independent media in evaluation panels.


🤝 5. Coordination

Area

Key Questions

Action Points

Internal Alignment

Are templates and indicators harmonised with DGs and Delegations?

Use shared reporting and MEL templates across Creative Europe, Horizon Europe, and external instruments.

Knowledge Exchange

Is institutional learning captured and shared?

Establish an internal knowledge hub across agencies to store anonymised evaluations and best practice.

Timing

Are call calendars coordinated?

Align timelines with DG CONNECT, DG JUST, and EEAS to support coherent pipelines.


📚 6. Research & Learning

Topic

Questions

Action Points

Evidence

Is programme learning feeding back into new calls?

Conduct meta-evaluations across portfolios to identify systemic trends.

Dissemination

Are results shared beyond grantees?

Require each project to include a learning and dissemination plan.

Cross-Sector Learning

Are links made between media, digital governance, and research communities?

Fund cross-disciplinary clusters under Horizon Europe and Creative Europe to connect journalism, technology, and democracy research.


🎙 Field Voices from Consultations

“Simpler and lighter compliance paths are essential to bring new actors in. Otherwise, only the same EU-based organisations will ever qualify.” — OECD Media Toolkit Interview, 2025

“Donors have varying reporting requirements… A unified package of basic documents would make a real difference.” — GFMD, Transforming Media Development Report (2023)


🔍 In Brief

EACEA and REA play a pivotal role in translating Europe’s democratic ambitions into practice. By embedding safety, flexibility, and learning into their programme management, they can help ensure that EU-funded media and information-integrity initiatives strengthen—not strain—the partners who deliver them.

Last updated

Was this helpful?