Finance & Investment
Strengthening media’s role in financing for development.
🧭 Purpose
Investment and development finance institutions — particularly the European Investment Bank (EIB), the European Investment Fund (EIF), and InvestEU — are critical to advancing Europe’s commitments to sustainable development, good governance, and democratic resilience.
Yet, despite growing recognition of the media’s watchdog role in exposing Illicit Financial Flows (IFFs), these institutions rarely integrate media or information integrity into their investment frameworks. The omission of media from the Compromiso de Sevilla outcome document of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development (FFD4) risks weakening accountability across the financing for development agenda.
By recognising independent journalism as both an enabler of transparency and a legitimate economic actor, the EIB, EIF, and InvestEU can strengthen the governance foundations of Europe’s global investment strategy.
💡 Why It Matters
Illicit financial flows cost developing economies trillions each year, undermining the very goals that EU finance seeks to achieve.
Investigative journalism and civic watchdogs are proven tools in exposing corruption and enabling asset recovery — yet they remain excluded from the development finance ecosystem.
Media viability underpins both economic stability and democratic governance: when journalism collapses, corruption flourishes, trust erodes, and public finance efficiency declines.
Integrating information integrity into investment frameworks safeguards public value, strengthens risk management, and aligns with EU priorities on anti-corruption, digital governance, and human rights.
📊 The Context
The Compromiso de Sevilla reaffirmed global commitments to the 2030 Agenda, the Pact for the Future, and the Global Digital Compact, positioning transparency and accountability at the core of financing for development.
However, it failed to name the media and information ecosystem as a stakeholder in these efforts — an omission that leaves a gap in implementation. Without free media, illicit flows remain hidden, and development investments lose both credibility and impact.
The EU’s financial instruments, through the EIB and EIF, already integrate social and environmental safeguards. These can be extended to include information integrity — ensuring that EU investments promote openness, evidence-based decision-making, and citizen oversight.
🏦 Strategic Recommendations
1. Recognise Media as Part of the Financing Ecosystem
EIB and EIF should explicitly recognise independent media as part of the governance infrastructure that enables sustainable investment. This recognition strengthens risk management, improves accountability, and demonstrates EU leadership in aligning finance with democracy.
2. Treat Media Enterprises as SMEs
Independent media outlets are micro- and small-enterprises that contribute to employment, innovation, and democratic resilience. They should have access to credit lines, equity instruments, and technical assistance under EIB/EIF and InvestEU SME programmes.
3. Blend Finance for Accountability
Combine EU grants, concessional loans, guarantees, and philanthropic co-investment to de-risk media investments. This blended approach mobilises private capital while preserving editorial independence.
4. Integrate Information Integrity into Digital Infrastructure
As EU development finance increasingly supports digital infrastructure, safeguards must ensure human rights, transparency, and accountability. This includes impact assessments, interoperability, and the promotion of open, secure, and inclusive systems that serve the public interest.
5. Support Investigative and Cross-Border Journalism
Invest in data journalism, cross-border investigations, and civic finance platforms that track illicit flows. Evidence of journalism’s contribution to asset recovery and governance reform should be included in EIB and EIF reporting frameworks.
Last updated
Was this helpful?